US firms insist to include exempted countries into S201

Thursday, 20 February 2003 14:03:00 (GMT+3)   |  
       

US firms insist to include exempted countries into S201

US steel companies continue to ask for the inclusion of Mexico and other 30 developing countries into the safeguard measures originally implemented in March 2002 by the Bush administration. The S201 safeguard measures were implemented at that date, with the purpose of protecting the US steel industry from the import surge of steel, resulting in many US steel companies going bankrupt, since 1994. The steel safeguard tariff program is designed to apply for three years, the firs year's duties ranging from 8% to 30%, but gradually decreasing in the second and third years. Mexico was excluded from the steel tariffs due to its NAFTA agreement with the US and Canada and the other 30 countries due to their developing country status. Today, the US steel companies claim that flats imports from Mexico have been 12% up since the implementation of the Bush administration tariffs in March. Furthermore the developing countries' imports reached to 1.6 million tons in the first 10 months of year 2002, compared to the 1.2 million tons figure for the same period of year 2001. The 30 developing countries concerned are; India, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Venezuela, Romania, Thailand, Bulgaria, Indonesia, Poland, Argentina, Chile, Hungary, El Salvador, Morocco, Costa Rica, Colombia, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Kenya, Honduras, Dominica, Antigua, Tunisia, Haiti, Philippines, Peru, Panama, Lithuania and Latvia. The timing of this request by the US steel companies might be contradictory as the Bush Administration lately invited new exemption requests to be evaluated. These new exclusions to be determined from around 600 requests received will be considered in addition to the excluded 727 foreign products accounting for approximately 3.2 million tons, i.e. 25% of the total 13 million tons of imports affected by the measures last year. The aim to grant exemptions is described as endeavours to protect the domestic mills from supply shortages for their production. Exemptions were originally intended to be granted mainly for products that are not produced in the US. Nevertheless, the expectancy of the US steel companies, among which are Nucor, Gallatin Steel, IPSCO, Steel Dynamics, Weirton Steel and Rouge Steel, is that not many of the new exemption requests will be accepted as they believe that most are for only the repetition of the initially requested but refused products. The decisions in this respect are expected to come out in March 2003. According to US authorities, the withdrawal of the safeguard measures might be in close relation to the progress of the international negotiations targeting to ban government subsidies, on the other hand industry experts expect that US would keep the three-year safeguard program in force unless WTO rules that same violates trade rules. If that will be the case, an initial decision is expected no sooner than spring, and to any decision to come out, it is commonly believed that an appeal will take place.

Similar articles

Ex-China HRC prices stable from mills, but tradable level gains $5/mt

30 Apr | Flats and Slab

Emirati buyers continue to favor ex-Japan HRC despite slow demand

30 Apr | Flats and Slab

Indian HRC exporters keep prices stable but mood still positive despite slow trade

30 Apr | Flats and Slab

Producers at IREPAS: Low demand and Chinese exports weigh heavily on global steel market

30 Apr | Steel News

EUROFER: EU’s finished steel exports down 2% in Jan-Feb

30 Apr | Steel News

EUROFER: EU’s steel imports from Turkey up sharply in Jan-Feb

30 Apr | Steel News

Brazilian HRC export price increases slightly in two weeks 

29 Apr | Flats and Slab

Prices maintain slight declining trend for Brazilian slab exports

29 Apr | Flats and Slab

Chile’s apparent steel consumption increases in 2023

29 Apr | Steel News

Cleveland-Cliffs initiates monthly HRC price letter

29 Apr | Steel News