New coalition of US manufacturers formed to combat Section 232 tariffs

Thursday, 19 April 2018 21:48:49 (GMT+3)   |   San Diego
       

The Coalition of American Metal Manufacturers and Users held a press conference Wednesday to introduce their association and launch their new initiative focused on terminating the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs.

The coalition represents a wide range of US manufacturing interests, from metal formers to machinists to food equipment manufacturers and others, and represents several manufacturing associations including the Industrial Fasteners Institute; the National Tooling and Machining Association; the North American Association of Food Equipment Manufacturers; the Precision Machined Parts Association; the Precision Metalforming Association; and the American Wire Producer Association (associate member).

“These tariffs will do nothing to uphold their stated purpose of protecting US national security,” said coalition spokesperson Paul Nathanson. “They will instead hurt US manufacturers in the near term by raising the price of the essential inputs they need to make finished products, and do long-term harm to domestic steel producers by eroding their own customer base.”

“It doesn’t matter what finished product you manufacture; if you use steel or aluminum as an input, your costs are rising as a result of these tariffs,” continued Nathanson. “It also doesn’t matter whether you use domestic or imported steel or aluminum, because the effect is the same: higher prices for your basic inputs.”

At the press conference, the coalition said the 232 scenario manufacturers are facing today is nearly identical to what they faced in 2002, when steel was locked out of the US through the Section 201 tariffs. The decision to shut out the normal flow of global steel commerce left a smaller amount of steel available inside the United States, driving up costs for steel users. Studies show that 200,000 manufacturing jobs were lost due to the imposition of those 201 tariffs.   

“The Coalition is united in its efforts to address the same fundamental problem that we experienced in 2002,” continued Nathanson. “Tariffs help a small handful of steel producers while jeopardizing the viability of thousands of steel-using manufacturers.”

“Tariffs are taxes, plain and simple,” he concluded. “The administration’s stated goal is to create new jobs and help US manufacturers prosper, but these tariffs will bring the opposite result.”

 


Similar articles

US Senators propose bill to stop “Mexican steel surge”

13 Mar | Steel News

US ITC rejects proposed additional duty on tin mill product imports from Turkey

08 Feb | Steel News

US and Brazil negotiate to remove trade barriers

08 Nov | Steel News

US Supreme Court declines to hear steel importer’s Section 232 appeal

30 Oct | Steel News

US and EU fail to reach agreement on Section 232 tariffs, aim for deal later this year

20 Oct | Steel News

WTO decides against Chinese countermeasures on US Section 232

18 Aug | Steel News

US Supreme Court rejects challenge to Section 232 tariffs on steel imports

29 Mar | Steel News

US ITC: Importers pay nearly full cost of Section 232 tariffs

17 Mar | Steel News

AISI applauds Congressional Steel Caucus’ efforts to maintain Section 232

02 Mar | Steel News

US DOC ordered to review its rejection of NLMK’s Section 232 exemption requests for slab imports

26 Jan | Steel News